The dodgy Dodgie numbers from Doga use a Tesla technology

Elon Musk has promised that the work of his so -called department for government efficiency or DogWould be “maximum transparent”. Doge’s website is proof of this that Tesla And Spaceex CEO and now advisor to the White House has repeatedly said. There, the group maintains a list of cut -off grants and budgets, an ongoing record of their work.

But in the past few weeks The New York Times reported This doge not only published important mistakes on the website, but also a mastiff, for example with a saving of 8 billion US dollars if The contract terminated for $ 8 million And had already paid 2.5 million US dollars – but also worked on disguising these mistakes, afterwards and deleted the identification of details on the cuts of Doge from the website and later even from their code, which made it easy for the public to check and persecute this.

For roadsafety researchers who have been pursuing muscles for years, the Operandi mode is known. Doge “put a few numbers out, they don’t smell well, they pulled things around,” claimed Noah GoodallAn independent transport researcher. “Tesla screamed. You have the feeling that they are not really interested in the truth.”

For almost a decade, Goodall and others have been pursuing Tesla’s publicity approval on his autopilot and fully self-driving functions, advanced driver assistance systems that are supposed to make driving less stressful and safer. Over the years, the researchers claim, Tesla has published security statistics without proper context. Promoted numbers that are impossible for external experts to check; observed favorable security statistics that later proved to be misleading; And even changed retrospectively already published security statistics. The numbers were so inconsistent that Tesla brought fully self -driving fans to crowdsourcing Performance data itself.

Instead of publishing public data: “What we have is these little snippets that, when the researchers look at them in context,”, “claims Bryant Walker Smith, a legal professor and engineer who studies autonomous vehicles at the University of South Carolina.

State -supported whoopsia

Tesla’s first and public number mixture Came 2018When it was his first autopilot security figures after the release First known death of a driver with autopilot. The researchers immediately found that the numbers seemed to show that drivers who used autopilot The critical context lacked the characters.

At that time, Autopilot combined an adaptive speed control that maintains a defined distance between the Tesla and the vehicle in front of it, and the steering shooter that centered the car between the lane markings. However, the comparison did not control the type of cars (luxury vehicles, the only type that Tesla did at this point, less likely than others), the person who drove the car (Tesla owner, was rather wealthy and older and it was more wealthy and older and therefore less likely that they storm, or the types of streets on which Teslas drove (autopilot) were only crashed.

The confusion did not stop here. In response to the fatal autopilot crash Tesla act Present some security figures to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the country’s road safety regulation. With these illustrations the NHTSA published a report This indicates that autopilot led to a reduction in accidents by 40 percent. Tesla promoted cheap statistics, Even quote it whenIn 2018, another person died when using autopilot.