Face recognition falls on the police in the event of a murder in Ohio

The police from Cleveland, Ohio, may have botched their chances of convicting a suspected murderer by using the controversial Clearview AI facial recognition tool as a sole evidence that justifies a search of the house of the suspect.

In February, the Qeyeon Tolbert department arrested and accused him of the murder of Blake Story, who was shot twice after leaving a Blood Plasma donation center. The investigators who have been refined on Tolbert after they have sent a video surveillance video of a suspect to the regional fusion center of the northeast -ohio – a group that bundles the surveillance functions of local, state and state authorities – and received an identification of the man in the video , accordingly Court files.

Based on the identification, CPD received a search command against Tolbert’s house, in which the officials allegedly recaptured a firearm and other evidence. However, a judge in Cuyahoga County decided at the beginning of this month that none of these evidence was permitted in the process. The Cleveland Plain Dealer Was the first to report the verdict.

Tolbert’s lawyers argued that CPDs vaguely report on the preservation of identification from the merger center left out a crucial fact: the only evidence that deals with Tolbert as examination demonstrations and should not only be dependent on an arrest. “

At least eight people across the country were wrongly arrested after a recently carried out facial -known tools Investigation of the Washington Post This showed that more than a dozen police stations had made arrests based on facial recognition agreement without other confirming evidence.

In cases where the police made false arrests based on facial recognition agreement, the police paid in the end Hundreds of thousands of dollars To enclose complaints.

While facial recognition instruments often achieve high accuracy metrics in laboratory tests, they can be less effective in real settings in which people can introduce mistakes, e.g. B. pictures or pictures of the wrong person.

In the case of Cleveland, the CCTV video, which ran through the Clearview Ai, and a match for Tolbert, watched a person who came into a business that “had the same components, hairstyles, clothing and hiking features” like that The man who was seen in the recording of surveillance materials. The detective downloaded the video crossing from the shop on February 20 and sent them to the merger.

As a result, as Tolbert’s lawyer emphasized, the Clearview game was not even derived from the film material of the crime itself, but only a man’s film material that thought that the shooter like the shooter looked like the shooter.

The public prosecutor of the district of Cuyahoga has appealed against the decision of the district court, which suppressed the evidence that the police allegedly recovered from the search of Tolbert’s house.