Elon Musks X asks the Supreme Court to protect users from the US government

Switch off the editor’s digest free of charge

Roula Khalaf, editor of the FT, selects her favorite stories in this weekly newsletter.

The Social Media company X of Elon Musk asked the Supreme Court to protect its users from US criminal prosecution authorities and intervenes in a case that could force the federal government to create an arrest warrant for access to private data.

In A meager X brought to court, said X, it was concerned about “broad, suspicious” inquiries, and added that platforms “should not be forced to help governments undermine the privacy of their users”.

The support letter submitted on Friday is submitted in a long-term case by James Harper, a user of Crypto Exchange Coin base. He claims that he was one of thousands of Coinbase customers whose merchant data was handed over to the Internal Revenue Service as part of a “fishing expedition” by the agency in potential tax fraud, which violates the data protection guidelines of the location.

The US government would restrict a victory for the plaintiff in the case that the Supreme Court has not yet belonged musk is a part – of convincing data that should be handed over by X without “probable cause and special suspicion”.

X, what was bought on Friday From Musk’s artificial intelligence company Xai, it refused to comment on submission.

A person near X said Harper’s case “throws concern about the fact that the speech of (x) users may be restricted if the government may have access to user data without a court -approved search order”.

They added: “This problem is not specific to X. This means that the constitution does not prevent the government from searching the account of a user on a social media platform or a financial platform.”

The time of intervention by X – The only individual company that has submitted a letter in the previous case – is remarkable for the veterinarian migrants in view of the use of public materials by the Trump management on social media.

The Ministry of Homeland Protection Protection last month Proposals to expand the collection of social media accounts of Visa applicants and those who want to apply for a place of residence in the United States.

A spokesman for the White House did not answer a request for a comment.

The submission of X in the case of the Supreme Court is also made, since Musk has increasingly combative approach for the worldwide government efforts to censor social media users.

Since the purchase of X for $ 44 billion in 2022, the self -proclaimed “freedom of speech” Absolutist “Takedown” assisted in Brazil, India and Australia, which has gathered with governments and judiciary in these countries.

In the case of Harper, X seems to be feared that the US government authorities could receive private records of the users by using a legal doctrine who gives the law enforcement authorities the right to access information that is shared by a person with third parties, even if no arrest warrant has been granted.

“When Tony Soprano hits an” arrangement “with a” Business Associate “, all promise of collateral promises are not enforceable, including promises to keep it secret” The sopranos.

“However, the terms of use between users and coinbase or X Corp would not be regarded as illegal contracts, just because some users are otherwise properly subject to government investigations.”

X collects financial data from brands that advertise on its platform, as well as users who offer or register Paywalled.

The platform wants to continue to work in financial services. The lawyers of X Wiesen in the order that the managing director Linda Yaccarino recently announced plans for the starting of X Money, a digital lamps and peer-to-peer payment service, with Visa as the first partner.

XS letter was submitted by lawyers at the Pacific Legal Foundation, a decades of law firm for public interests, who fights for bourgeois freedom. His employees have before criticized musk in other matters.

Chris Giancarlo, a lawyer at Willkie Farr, whose law firm represents another supporter of the plaintiff in the case of Pro Bono, said that the decision of the Supreme Court could “have a permanent effect on the standards according to which the government can access private information from customers about Krypto exchange and other platforms.”