Physical Address

304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

LIZ PEEK: Kamala Harris for president in 2028? Why there’s buzz about Biden 2.0



Enter Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to selected articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

If you are entering and continuing your e -mail, fox news. ‘ Conditions of use And Data protection guidelineincluding ours Announcement on financial incentives.

Please enter a valid email address.

NEWYou can now hear FOX News Articles!

Are Americans ready for bidges 2.0?

The country will get that if you choose Kamala Harris President in 2028. During the campaign of last year, the former VP did not even pretend to offer the country a change in the catastrophic bidding presidency. Harris told Sunny Hostin in the view notoriously, who asked what she could do differently than President Biden: “I can’t think of anything.” It may have been the strongest of the bishops guided by their campaigns.

After all, the country does not inspire the country exactly by illegally entering millions of people to enter the country, to say goodbye to an expensive green agenda, to involve the federal authority or to drive inflation with excessive expenses for several decades. When the survey, the voters who ask for changes – the candidates should commit themselves.

Harris draws social media during an earthquake

At many fronts it is astonishing that Kamala Harris’s chances of running for the Oval Office forms a slight sum. So far, it has indeed “low”, audible, mainly for campaign advisors who hope to earn another multi-billion rage, and frankly for happy republicans who love their chances if Harris should receive democratic nomination.

Chatter over the former vp and California Senator I picked up last week because Harris finally emerged from the witness protection program to give a speech. It was her first public appearance in five months.

She appeared in front of a group that appeared, a non -profit organization that is “exhausting [Democrat] Women’s leaders with state -of -the -art tools and training courses to run and win from the elected office. “Harris is probably not the most convincing example of the effectiveness of Emerge.

After all, Harris didn’t just lose against Donald TrumpBut lost every swing state and the referendum, although it spent more than 2 billion US dollars, including Geldern from Super Pacs. Keep in mind that even Hillary Clinton’s Hillary Clinton would not like the 2016 referendum with 2.3 million votes. Harris not only lost a big man, but also pulled her party off, with Democrats also losing four seats in the Senate and their majority.

Since Harris was not classified as a successful vice president for almost her entire four years and would consider her bad representation last year for almost her entire four years last year, why would someone even consider giving her a second chance? Just because Democrats are in trouble. The party has no visible leadership because Nancy Pelosi and Joe Biden have withdrawn from the field of vision, Barack Obama is invisible and Chuck Schumer is fighting a possible main challenge of the New York representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

Harris, the last national figure with a considerable name recognition, is. But the suffering of the party goes beyond the lack of leadership. Democrats also have no message and no platform. All you have is hate against Donald Trump.

At the Emerge meeting, Kamala Harris, apart from a special foray in elephant behavior, spent her short appearance with Trump to repeat the chorus and lies to his critics. It did not offer any new guidelines, no ideas on how to make life better for the Americans.

This is not a winning formula. With all the breathless reports about Donald Trump’s failing surveys and unpopularness, the president still deserves higher recognition ratings than Democrats. A current survey by CNN/SSRS showed that the respondents were asked when the respondents were asked who would do a better job as president, 45 percent of Trump, while 43 percent Harris decided, roughly in line with the election results of the past year. In addition, a survey by ABC News/Washington Post/Ipsos reported from the end of April, when the respondents were asked, whoever trusted them to deal with the main problems of the country, 40 percent chose Trump, while only 32 percent in the congress selected the Democrats.

In her Emerge speech, Harris unwittingly revealed the essential problem of her party. She mentioned that they were inspired “by managers in the entire spectrum, including the congress manager such as Cory Booker, Chris van Hollen, Chris Murphy, Jasmine Crockett, Maxwell Frost, AOC and Bernie Sanders, who spoke in different ways with moral clarity about this moment.”

Click here to find more opinion from FOX News

Note that the cited “leaders” are the most advanced members of their party. They neither speak “in different ways” nor “in the entire spectrum”; They all papabet the same left-left-the-the-the-the-the-the-rich uninstity of the government, which most Americans loathe. Democrats, including Kamala Harris, are in a thrall in the most liberal wing of their party and they will continue to cost them.

Unfortunately, progressive for Democrats have the energy and money of the party. It acts Bernie SandersHe warned that the billionaire 1993, 1994, 1995, 2007, 2012, 2014, 2015, 2017, 2018 and now … again … again … again … again. Sanders spent the same thing Direar alarmS over oligarchs for decades, and now others have jumped on board.

According to Sanders and his group, Elon Musk and other Tech CEOs are a threat to our country, but only if they support the GOP. Oligarches such as Bill Gates, Mark Cuban or George Soros, the Democrats, are obviously not a threat to the nation.

Click here to get the FOX News app

Harris makes a mistake that connects to her party’s left wing. Gallup surveys consistently shows that only a minority of the country – 25% – sees itself as “liberal” or “very liberal”, while 37% of themselves “conservative” or very conservative and 34% say that they are “moderate”. How do Democrats expect to win elections if only a quarter of the country is ideologically in their corner?

In 2016, Hillary Clinton Primarily lost because supporters of Bernie Sanders could not get out to vote for them. In 2020, Joe Biden Bernie’s platform took over in return for the support of the Vermont Socialist, and he won. But Bernie’s preference for the Green New Deal, open boundaries and attacks on the rich were not able to put Harris over the finish line last year. It will not bring them to a victory in 2028.

Click here to read more from Liz Peek



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *